Some States Ready to Reopen | REUTERS

REUTERS APRIL 15, 2020 / 10:29 AM

Some governors believe their states ready to reopen after coronavirus shutdown, CDC head says

Governors of about 20 U.S. states where the new-coronavirus pandemic has had a low impact believe they may be ready to start the process of reopening their economies by President Donald Trump’s May 1 target date, a top U.S. health official said on Wednesday.

Robert Redfield, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said the CDC was prepared to assist those states in the process of lifting restrictions aimed at controlling the spread of the virus, which has contributed to the deaths of at least 28,000 people across the country.

“There are a number of states – 19, 20 states – that really have had limited impact from it. So I think we will see some states that are – the governors feel that they’re ready – we’re poised to assist them with that reopening,” Redfield said in an interview with ABC’s “Good Morning America.”

Yet, health experts say that to avoid a second wave of infections as people return to work in certain states, extensive testing must be available to track infections, as well as contact tracing and antibody testing to learn who had been previously infected and might have some immunity.

Reopen coronavirus plan

The CDC and the Federal Emergency Management Agency have put together a public health strategy to reopen parts of the country as part of the larger White House effort to get Americans back to work, the Washington Post reported.

The plan cites three phases: A national communication campaign and community readiness assessment through May 1; increased emergency funding and production of testing kits and personal protective equipment through May 15; and staged reopenings depending on local conditions.


Read more: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-usa-idUSKCN21X25I

Global Tracker: https://graphics.reuters.com/HEALTH-CORONAVIRUS-USA/0100B5K8423/index.html

Coronavirus Stimulus Check

Eligible Americans with direct deposit accounts set up have begun to receive their coronavirus relief payment.

Over 80 million Americans will see the coronavirus stimulus checks deposited into their bank accounts today. 

The first round of checks, which are part of the federal government’s response to unprecedented unemployment levels financial strain caused by coronavirus pandemic, were automatically deposited into the bank accounts of those who filed a 2018 or 2019 tax return and received a refund via direct deposit.

Social Security retirement and disability beneficiaries will also automatically receive their payments.

Those who do not typically file tax returns and have not provided the IRS with their bank account information, as well anyone receiving paper checks will have to wait a bit longer, according to the U.S. Treasury.

No checks have been mailed yet, and it is expected to take a few months for all of them to be sent out.

You can track your payment with the new IRS Get My Payment tool. You will need to input your Social Security number and the mailing address on your last tax return to check the status of your check.

Eligibility

For Americans to receive the coronavirus stimulus check, an individual must have a work-eligible Social Security number and cannot be the dependent of another taxpayer. The relief applies to both people without incomes and those whose sole income is derived from a benefit program, like Social Security.

The payments will be $1,200 per adult for those with adjusted gross incomes of up to $75,000. The threshold for married couples is $150,000 – they are eligible for $2,400 and $500 per child.

The payment steadily declines for those who make more. Those earning more than $99,000, or $198,000 for joint filers, are not eligible. The thresholds are slightly different for those who file as a head of household.

Parents will also receive $500 for each qualifying child.

What you need to do

The IRS will administer the program and determine eligibility based on an individual’s 2019 tax return. If 2019 taxes have not been filed, the agency will look at their field 2018 tax returns. That includes individuals who file returns for the Earned Income Tax Credit but do not otherwise pay taxes.

For most people, the stimulus checks will be directly deposited in American tax payers bank account if the government has that information from your tax return. But some people who might not traditionally file tax returns will need to take action. People behind on filing their federal tax returns might also want to get caught up.

The government will default to sending you the check by mail if a tax payer did not use direct deposit.  However, IRS and Treasury will develop an online portal in the coming weeks for individuals to provide their banking information so that they can receive the payments immediately instead of in the mail.


Sources:

  1. https://www.foxbusiness.com/money/coronavirus-stimulus-checks-expected-tax-return

Coronavirus stimulus payments flow into Americans’ bank accounts

Updated: April 15, 2020 2 pm

Eligible Americans with direct deposit accounts set up have begun to receive their coronavirus relief payment.

Over 80 million Americans will see the coronavirus stimulus checks deposited into their bank accounts today. 

The first round of checks, which are part of the federal government’s response to unprecedented unemployment levels and financial strain caused by the coronavirus pandemic, were automatically deposited into the bank accounts of those who filed a 2018 or 2019 tax return and received a refund via direct deposit. 

Social Security retirement and disability beneficiaries will also automatically receive their payments.

Those who do not typically file tax returns and have not provided the IRS with their bank account information, as well anyone receiving paper checks will have to wait a bit longer, according to the U.S. Treasury.

No checks have been mailed yet, and it is expected to take a few months for all of them to be sent out.

You can track your payment with the new IRS Get My Payment tool. You will need to input your Social Security number and the mailing address on your last tax return to check the status of your check.

IRS deposited the first Economic Impact Payments into taxpayers’ bank accounts.

The payments, also referred to by some as stimulus payments, are automatic for most taxpayers. No further action is needed by taxpayers who filed tax returns in 2018 and 2019 and most seniors and retirees.

According to the IRS, “We know many people are anxious to get their payments; we’ll continue issuing them as fast as we can.”

For security reasons, the IRS plans to mail a letter about the economic impact payment to the taxpayer’s last known address within 15 days after the payment is paid. The letter will provide information on how the payment was made and how to report any failure to receive the payment. If a taxpayer is unsure they’re receiving a legitimate letter, the IRS urges taxpayers to visit IRS.gov first to protect against scam artists.

For #COVIDreliefIRS updates see: irs.gov/coronavirus

Hydroxychloroquine not approved to treat COVID-19

Pushing a malaria drug

The Trump Administration has touted hydroxychloroquine to treat patients with COVID-19, despite a paucity of scientific evidence that it’s an effective treatment. The drug, hydroxychloroquine, is a popular malaria and lupus treatment.

The Trump administration continues to cite small unscientific studies in China and France as evidence that hydroxychloroquine helps treat COVID-19 patients. The most recent study came from China and found that the anti-malaria drug helped speed the recovery of a small number of patients who were mildly or moderately ill, though notes that the evidence is limited.

The report anecdotal findings from China and France revealed that virus symptoms of cough, fever and pneumonia went away faster and that patients’ illness were less likely to become severe after administering hydroxychloroquine.

The FDA has not approved hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19, though it has granted it limited emergency-use authorization. But medical experts warn that reports of the drug’s benefits for COVID-19 patients are anecdotal and small-scale. And, there is little scientific evidence that proves it efficacy against the coronavirus.

Medical experts warn of hydroxychloroquine potentially severe side effects, which can include impaired vision, hearing loss, paranoia and cardiac arrhythmias, which could be fatal for patients with heart problems or who are taking certain antidepressants. “It is not like water. It is not harmless,” one emergency-room doctor and research scientist said.

The administration’s touting of chloroquine has already created a shortage, making it unavailable for some patients with existing prescriptions for the drug.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, has repeatedly said it’s too soon to say if the drug would be effective against COVID-19.


References:

  1. https://www.marketwatch.com/story/trump-again-touts-unproven-drug-to-treat-coronavirus-what-do-you-have-to-lose-2020-04-05?link=sfmw_fb
  2. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/health/2020/04/06/hydroxychloroquine-trump-anthony-fauci-peter-navarro-whos-right/2953317001/

Chinese Stocks are Risky

Recently Luckin Coffee (LK) issued a press release admitting that their chief operating officer had fabricated a significant amount of sales from the second quarter through the fourth quarter of 2019.  This caused Luckin Coffee share price to fall 82% in U.S. trading and leaving investor with little recourse.

Luckin, a rival of Starbucks in China, happen to be a fairly new public company that opened its initial public offering (IPO) in May 2019.  In the case of Luckin, investors needed to exercise caution when a company goes from zero to a $3 billion market capitalization valuation in less than two years.  Furthermore, it is important to understand that what occurred with Luckin Coffee can occur with other Chinese companies with stocks listed on U.S. equity market exchanges since they are not required to comply with Security and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) strict disclosure and transparency requirements.

Chinese stocks and emerging-markets stocks

China is the world’s second-largest economy and is still growing as an emerging market. Investing in young Chinese companies can be extremely risky.  Although the growth available in China is clearly appealing, there are a number of inherent risks for investors.  The risks include currency manipulation, ineffectual securities reporting standards, the draconian influence of China’s communist government, and the potential for financial fraud.

Recent economic and equity market history are rife with financial frauds and illegal activity related to Chinese companies listed on U.S. equity exchanges.  Many seasoned U.S. investors advise that Americans should avoid investing in Chinese stocks. They even recommend avoiding the few larger Chinese companies with established histories and strong management track records.

Delisting Chinese Stocks

To avoid future Luckin Coffee frauds perpetrated on unsuspecting American investors, “Chinese companies should be delisted from American exchanges if they don’t follow U.S. securities laws”, according to Senator Marco Rubio.  Senator Rubio believes that increase oversight is vitally required for Chinese and other foreign companies listed on American stock exchanges. In fact, he and colleagues have offered legislation that calls for delisting firms that are out of compliance with U.S. regulators for a period of three years.

Bottomline, it is difficult to trust the financial statements coming out of some high-flying companies based there. Fundamentals don’t matter if you can’t be sure the numbers are real and it is difficult to invest in Chinese companies that might be trying to deceive investors.


References:

  1. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/luckin-coffee-chairman-defaults-loan-152735017.html
  2. https://www.msn.com/en-us/finance/topstocks/investing-lessons-from-the-luckin-coffee-accounting-fraud-debacle/ar-BB12eas4
  3. https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/08/marco-rubio-chinese-firms-should-be-delisted-in-us-if-they-dont-follow-laws.html

Some Auto Insurers Refunding Premiums

Drivers that stay home have fewer accidents and file fewer claims.

Many U.S property-casualty insurance companies are planning to refund a percentage of automobile policy holders payment due to the COVID-19 pandemic and the many stay at home orders that are in place across our nation.  As a result, trends show that Americans are “heeding the calls to suspend nonessential travel, leading to fewer miles driven and fewer accidents”.

For example, one the country’s largest property-casualty insurers indicated to its policy holders that it “will be returning $520 million to its members. This payment is a result of data showing members are driving less due to stay-at-home and shelter-in-place guidance across the country. Every member with an auto insurance policy in effect as of March 31, 2020, will receive a 20% credit on two months of premiums in the coming weeks.”

Refunding a percentage policy holders automobile premium payments makes sense since Americans are driving less and as a result, are involved in substantially less traffic accidents and filing significantly less claims.  During unprecedented times like these, it behooves all property-casualty insurance company executives to be a part of the solution and put cash back into consumers’ wallets by refunding a portion of policy holders premium.  Otherwise, they and the companies they lead will be unduly profiting from this pandemic nightmare that has spread across the U.S.

The amounts may be small relatively speaking, but every little bit will help if it puts dollars into Americans’ wallets.


  1. https://communities.usaa.com/t5/Press-Releases/USAA-to-Return-520-Million-to-Members/ba-p/228150?_ga=2.107157259.825316722.1586454769-212589225.1586454769
  2. https://www.aarp.org/auto/car-maintenance-safety/info-2020/coronavirus-car-insurance-premium-refund.html

How to discontinue COVID-19 home isolation

Centers for Disease Control guidelines say someone who has tested positive for coronavirus can end isolation if he or she has not had a fever for three days, other symptoms have subsided and it’s been seven days since symptoms first appeared.

People with COVID-19 who have stayed home (home isolated) can stop home isolation under the following conditions:

If you will not have a test to determine if you are still contagious, you can leave home after these three things have happened:

  • You have had no fever for at least 72 hours (that is three full days of no fever without the use medicine that reduces fevers)

AND

  • other symptoms have improved (for example, when your cough or shortness of breath have improved)

AND

  • at least 7 days have passed since your symptoms first appeared

If you will be tested to determine if you are still contagious, you can leave home after these three things have happened:

  • You no longer have a fever (without the use medicine that reduces fevers)

AND

  • other symptoms have improved (for example, when your cough or shortness of breath have improved)

AND

  • you received two negative tests in a row, 24 hours apart. Your doctor will follow CDC guidelines.

When to Seek Medical Attention

Reported illnesses have ranged from mild symptoms to severe illness and death for confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases.

These symptoms may appear 2-14 days after exposure. If you develop emergency warning signs for COVID-19 get medical attention immediately.

Emergency warning signs include:

  • Trouble breathing
  • Persistent pain or pressure in the chest
  • New confusion or inability to arouse
  • Bluish lips or face

This list is not all inclusive. Please consult your medical provider for any other symptoms that are severe or concerning.

Financial Life Planning

“People have the potential to live longer than any other time in history. This gift of extra time requires that we fundamentally redefine retirement and our life journeys leading up to it.” What is “Retirement’?  Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies

Financial Life Planning connects the dots between our financial realities, our values and the lives we long to live. It helps both pre-retirees and retirees identify their core values and connect them with their financial decisions and life goals. It is an financial planning and investing approach which helps people manage their portfolio.

Financial life plan focuses on the human side of financial planning, including people’s anxiety, habits, behaviors and other emotions (e.g., fear and greed) tied to investing money and accumulating wealth. People struggling with retirement and other finances really need a plan that helps them manage their attitudes, habits, goals and resources.

George Kinder, known to most as the “father” of the life planning, is the founder of Kinder Institute. He views life planning as “a way of holistically delivering financial planning that focuses on delving into people’s real goals, beyond just their financial concerns, in an effort to help them use their money to deliver freedom into their lives”.

Financial Life Planning combines personal finance and wellness. It spends time to discussing life planning and to building an intentional life. There is more to living a life of freedom and purpose than money and wealth. To live a life of freedom and purpose, people are encouraged to consider George Kinder’s famous Three Questions, which are:

Question 1: Design Your Life

“I want you to imagine that you are financially secure, that you have enough money to take care of your needs, now and in the future. The question is, how would you live your life? What would you do with the money? Would you change anything? Let yourself go. Don’t hold back your dreams. Describe a life that is complete, that is richly yours.”

Question 2: You have less time

“This time, you visit your doctor who tells you that you have five to ten years left to live. The good part is that you won’t ever feel sick. The bad news is that you will have no notice of the moment of your death. What will you do in the time you have remaining to live? Will you change your life, and how will you do it?”

Question 3: Today’s the day

“This time, your doctor shocks you with the news that you have only one day left to live. Notice what feelings arise as you confront your very real mortality. Ask yourself: What dreams will be left unfulfilled? What do I wish I had finished or had been? What do I wish I had done? ”

Society tends to attribute personal and professional success to the acquisition of material things and the accumulation of wealth. Most of us find ourselves inextricably caught in a cycle of earning, spending, and investing often induced by societal and peer pressures to fit into a perceived definition of success.

And in spite of this, how many times have we heard from even well-to-do friends, acquaintances and relatives that they are not exactly happy with how their lives have shaped up, how they don’t enjoy what they are doing, how they are drowning in debt or living paycheck to paycheck, or how they don’t have any time to pursue their dreams and interests?

If you look closely, there is a common undercurrent running across all these statements that we find ourselves ‘enslaved’ to a script or lifestyle broadcast by social media which was not exactly aligned to our values and innermost dreams.

No one ever wanted to spend more time in the office

“No one ever said on their deathbed ‘I wish I’d spent more time at the office.’ ” Harold Kushner

Having read many anecdotal reports regarding end of life issues, it is important what truly matters to most people in the end. Typically, people do not say that they wish they had earned more money, spent more time at work, or had one more side hustle.

Most often instead, they wish they had spent more time with family and friends. They had more experiences with those that they love. They had taken better care of their health and bodies over the decades. They had saved more and planned better for their retirement. And finally, they wanted to make sure that those they left behind would be taken care of once they were gone.


References:

  1. https://www.kiplinger.com/article/retirement/T023-C000-S004-retirees-build-a-financial-plan-based-on-you.html
  2. https://www.kinderinstitute.com
  3. https://www.kitces.com/blog/george-kinder-institute-life-planning-podcast-seven-stages-maturity/
  4. Podcast: #FASuccess Ep 015: Why Life Planning Is Simply Financial Planning Done Right With George Kinder

Do the Least Harm* | Monday Morning Outlook by First Trust

By Brian S. Wesbury, Chief Economist and Robert Stein, Deputy Chief Economist

Date: 4/6/2020

Doctors think differently than economists. They put patients with a potential for brain damage in an artificial coma to stop swelling, and when it stops, they bring them out. This fits with the Hippocratic Oath all doctors take, which states “First, do no harm.” The idea is to “limit” damage and then “restart” a more normal body with fewer problems.

The economy doesn’t work that way. You can’t just “turn it off” and then “restart it” as if nothing happened. When you turn off an economy you create permanent damage. While this is impossible to prove – there is no precedent in history from which to judge – it is easy to surmise.

We have all heard news stories about small business owners (or know them ourselves) who have been moved to close their businesses for good. They will never re-open. Some studies say the median small business has enough cash to last less than a month. That’s the median. And there are 30 million small businesses.

Shutdowns of restaurants and bars started in mid-March, and now cover most of the United States. These shutdowns spread to “non-essential” (as deemed by government) businesses over the past month. It is now April. In other words, many of those 30 million small companies are already in serious trouble. Many will be forced to close their doors for good before this is all over.

Simply put, shutting down the economy has serious consequences. If the economy were to reopen by Easter, which seems impossible now, it would probably open with, at most, 97% of its original capacity. It’s like a muscle, without use it atrophies. And when it does, it needs physical therapy to recover. The longer it’s sedentary, the worse the atrophy, the more difficult (and painful) the recovery.

If we wait until the end of April, it will be, say, 92%. The end of May and it’s 85%. The end of June and it’s even less. These are just guesstimates, we know that, but it’s what we think is the right framework to look at things. The longer the shutdown lasts, the more permanent damage to the economy. Capacity would eventually come back, but it would take time, perhaps years. Businesses that had just the right mix of managers, workers, and suppliers, can’t just magically re-create that mix by snapping their fingers when this is done. The US economy is not Sleeping Beauty, ready to wake up at first kiss by the government.

During the Great Depression, the suicide rate in the US hit the highest level in history. Recessions are traumatic, both physically and emotionally. Anxiety and depression multiply the problems of being jobless. The consequences are very real, though often hard to track.

The faster the economy opens again, the less the long-term damage. But this would mean government has to do a cost-benefit analysis of economic damage as well as the health costs of Coronavirus. So far, that’s not happened. It’s time government set up a Coronavirus Economic Task Force.

It’s true that $2 trillion in government bailout money, and trillions more from the Fed, will blunt the damage. But it won’t stop the atrophy. It just slows it down. More importantly, it significantly grows the power of government. It also boosts demand for goods, while the shutdowns artificially hold back supply, which causes inflation because demand exceeds supply.

One thing to remember is that even leaving parts of the economy open – grocery and drug stores, gas stations, restaurants for take-out, etc. – risks spreading the virus. So, by choice, we are already taking risk. Let’s expand that risk assessment and take into account all the risks, including the economic ones.

Things need to change. Why can’t landscapers work? Construction crews in many states are still working. Why can’t factories or machine shops that normally produce 8 hours a day, go to 24-hour production schedules – three, 8-hour shifts with fewer employees? If I can pick up food, why can’t I eat somewhere 6 feet away from others? There have to be a million ideas. Let’s start thinking about them, because the costs of the shutdown must be balanced with the benefits. It may not be possible to “do no harm” in the response to this pandemic, but we can at least try to “do the least harm.”


  1. https://www.ftportfolios.com/Commentary/EconomicResearch/2020/4/6/do-the-least-harm

*This report was prepared by First Trust Advisors L. P., and reflects the current opinion of the authors. It is based upon sources and data believed to be accurate and reliable. Opinions and forward looking statements expressed are subject to change without notice. This information does not constitute a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any security.