Buffet’s Owner’s Earnings

Owner earnings (OE) is a valuation method detailed by Warren Buffett in Berkshire Hathaway’s annual report in 1986. He stated that the value of a company is simply the total of the net cash flows (owner earnings) expected to occur over the life of the business, minus any reinvestment of earnings.

Owners’ earnings, also known as cash flow for owners, remains one of the more accurate measures of how much money we can make from an investment and helps calculate intrinsic value.

The formula for owners’ earnings is as follows:

OE = Net income + Non-cash charges – Maintenance Capex +/- Changes in working capital Where the below:

  • Non-cash = depreciation, amortization, impairment + other charges
  • Maintenance Capex = Cash a company spends to maintain normal biz operations.
  • Changes in working capital = adding the items under “Change in operating assets and liabilities” from the CF statement.

We will use a combination of cash flow statements to find the numbers.

To simplify some of this maintenance, the capex is an imprecise number that Buffett didn’t define precisely.

Many suggest different calculation methods; we will use the CF number to simplify.

Using $MSFT as our guinea pig for the year ending 2022. Below are the numbers taken from the financials:

  • Net income = $72,738
  • Non-cash = $16,260
  • Capex = ($23,866)
  • Changes in working capital = $446

Plugging in the numbers for $MSFT, we get:

Owners Earnings = $72,738+$16,260-$23,866+$446 = $65,578

Per share = $65,578 / 7,496 = 8.74

When compared to current P/FCF equals 8.70

Use these criteria to eliminate 95% of stocks:

Revenue growth 12%
Shares outstanding <2%
Net debt to FCF below 5x
Free cash flow growth +15%
Return on Invested capital +15%
Earnings per share growth +15%

12 companies that qualify:

 

Lessons from Charlie Munger

Lessons from Charlie Munger’s latest podcast interview: I have added some context to the interview to help you better understand the stories Munger shared.

1. On retail investors gambling in the stock market,

They don’t know anything about the companies or anything. They just gamble on going up and down in price. If I were running the world, I would have a tax on short-term gains with no offset for losses on anything, and I would just drive this whole car of people out of business.”

2. Why algorithmic-driven trading firms like Renaissance technology are taking excessive risk

“The easiest trade is to front run what you know, what the average is, what the index funds have to buy, and you know what it is. Exactly. They all know that. And they get their returns year after year by taking the leverage, the midday leverage, up higher and higher and higher and higher. So, they’re making smaller and smaller profits on more and more volume, which gives them this big peak leverage risk, which I would not run myself. And that’s the only way they make these big returns, is to have this huge leverage that would make you crazy if you were already rich.”

3. How Warren and Charlie changed their mind quickly with Diversified Retailing after they realized it was too competitive (and how they made a ton of money after changing their mind) Some context: On January 30, 1966, Buffett, Munger, and Gottesman formed a holding company, Diversified Retailing Company, Inc., to “acquire diversified businesses, especially in the retail field.” Buffett and Munger then went to the Maryland National Bank and asked for a loan to make the purchase. The lending officer looked at them goggle-eyed and exclaimed,

“Six million dollars for little old Hochschild-Kohn?”  Even after hearing this, Buffett and Munger—characteristically—did not question their judgment and ran screaming out the door.

“We thought we were buying a second-class department store at a third-class price” is how Buffett describes little old Hochschild-Kohn.

“We made nothing but money at Diversified. We didn’t exactly make it in retailing, but we made a lot of money. What happened was very simple. We bought this little department store chain in Baltimore. Big mistake. Too competitive. We realized we’d made a terrible mistake as the ink dried on the closing papers. So, we decided just to reverse it and take the hits to look foolish rather than go broke. You just told us how to get us out of this. By then, we’d already financed half of it on covenant-free debt. And they had all this extra cash, and our stocks got down to selling at enormous (discounts). In the middle of one of those recessions, we just bought, bought and bought and bought, and all that money went right into those stocks, and of course, we tripled it.”

4. How wonderful early years gave them a good head start. “Yeah, we bought a little savings and loan company for maybe $20 million. And when we left that thing, we had taken out of our little $20 million investment over $2 billion in marketable securities, which went into Nebraska insurance companies as part of their bedrock capital. So, we had some wonderful early years, which everybody needs. It is a wonderful early year.

5. Charlie Munger’s Costco thesis – They sold cheaper than anyone else in America – Big, efficient stores – Huge parking spaces – Gave special benefits to people who come to the store in the way of reward points – Make suppliers wait (for payment) until they’ve been paid What made Costco so successful?

Well, it takes a lot of good execution to do it. You have to set out to do it and then do it enthusiastically every day, every week, every year for 40 years. It’s not so damned easy. So, do you think success is the magic of the business model and culture? Yes. Culture plus model. Yes, absolutely. And very reliable, hardworking, determined execution for 40 years.

Why did it take Costco decades to open its first store in China?

“The first store they tried to open in China, somebody wanted a $30,000 bribe Chinese culture, and they just wouldn’t pay it. And that made such a bad impression on Jim Senegal. He wouldn’t even talk about going into China for about 30 years after that.”

6. Advice for investors on finding great investments A caveat from me: While Munger advocates heavy concentration (and leverage), most investors still need his IQ or emotional control with volatility.

“You may find it five years after you bought it. Knowing these things may work into it, or your understanding may improve, but when you know you have an edge, you should bet heavily. You know, you’re right. And most people don’t teach that in business school. It’s unbelievable. Of course, you got to bet heavily on your best bets.”

7. Why did he and Warren become partners, “Both kind of similar, and we both wanted to keep our families safe and do a good job for our investors and so on. We had similar attitudes. His advice for an enduring partnership is, “Well, it helps if you like one another and enjoy working together. But I don’t use any one formula. Many partnerships that work well for a long time happen because one’s good at one thing and good at another. They just naturally divided, and each one likes what he’s doing.”

8. Munger feels that Berkshire could’ve taken on more leverage. “Warren still cares more about the safety of his Berkshire shareholders than anything else. If we used a little more leverage throughout, we’d have three times as much now, and it wouldn’t have been that much more risky either.”

9. Munger’s thoughts on VC: “It’s challenging to invest money well, and I think it’s almost impossible to do time after time in venture capital. Some deals get so hot, and you have to decide quickly. You’re all just sort of gambling. [VC] is a very legitimate business if you do it right. If you want to give the right people the power and nurture them, help them. You know a lot about the game’s tricks, so you can help them run their business yet not interfere with them so much. They hate you. By and large, having bumped into many people in businesses with venture capital financing, I would say the ordinary rule is the people in the business doing the work; they, more often than not, hate the venture capitalists. They don’t feel their partner trying to help them because they’re only taking care of themselves and don’t like them.”

10. How could VCs be better? “[At Berkshire], they know we’re not trying to discard them to the highest bid. See, if some asshole investment banker offers us 20 times earnings for some lousy business we don’t sell. If it’s a problem business we’ve never been able to fix, we’ll sell it. But if it’s a halfway decent business, we never sell anything. And that gives us this reputation of staying with things that help us. You don’t want to make money by screwing your investors, and that’s what many venture capitalists do.”

11. Why Warren’s investment in Japan was a no-brainer: “If you’re as smart as Warren Buffett, maybe two or three times a century, you get an idea like that. The interest rates in Japan were half a percent per year for ten years. These trading companies were entrenched old companies, and they had all these cheap copper mines and rubber foundations so that you could borrow all the money for ten years ahead and buy the stocks, which paid 5% dividends. So, there’s a huge cash flow with no investment, thought, or anything. How often do you do that? You’ll be lucky if you get one or two a century. We could do that [because of Berkshire credit]. Nobody else could.”

12. Why he loves companies with a strong brand—the ability to raise prices: “Well, it’s hard for us not to love brands since we were lucky enough to buy the Sees candy for $20 million as our first acquisition, and we found out fairly quickly that we could raise the price every year by 10%, and nobody cared. We didn’t make the volumes go up or anything like that; we just increased the profits. So, we’ve been raising the price by 10% annually for all these 40 years. It’s been a very satisfactory company. We didn’t acquire any new capital. That was what was so good about it. Very little new capital.

13. What it takes to build Berkshire from scratch today – Intelligence – Work very hard – Be very lucky

14. His view on China: “My position in China has been that the Chinese economy has better prospects over the next 20 years than almost any other big economy. That’s number one. Number two, the leading companies of China are stronger and better than any other leading companies anywhere, and they’re available at a much cheaper price. So naturally, I’m willing to have some China risk in the Munger portfolio. How much is China risk? Well, that’s not a scientific subject. But I don’t mind. Whatever it is, 18% or something.”

15. What about BYD that captivated Munger?

Guy (Wang Chuanfu) was a genius. He was at a Ph.D. in engineering, and he could look at somebody’s part, make that part, look at the morning, and look at it in the afternoon. He could make it. I’d never seen anybody like that. He could do anything. He is a natural engineer and gets it-done type production executive. And that’s a big thing. It’s a big lot of talent to have in one place. It’s advantageous. They’ve solved all these problems on these electric cars and the motors and the acceleration, braking, and so on.” Comparing Elon with Wang Chuanfu, “Well, he’s a fanatic that knows how actually to make things with his hands, so he has to he’s closer to ground zero. In other words, the guy at BYD is better at making things than Elon.”

16. Advice about building families “Well, of course, you’ve got to get along with everybody. You have got to help them through their tough times, and they help you, and so forth. But I think it’s not as hard as it is. Looks. I think half of the marriages in America work pretty damn well. And will it work just as well if both of them had to marry somebody else? And you’ve got to have trust with your spouse when it comes to things like the education of the children and so forth.

Source:  https://x.com/SteadyCompound/status/1718861611904241789

Value vs Growth Stocks

Value investors want to buy stocks for less than they’re worth. If you could buy $100 bills for $80, wouldn’t you do so? ~ Motley Fool

Most public equity stocks are classified as either value stocks or growth stocks. Generally speaking:

  • A value stock trades for a cheaper price than its financial performance and fundamentals suggest it’s worth.
  • A growth stock is a stock in a company expected to deliver above-average returns compared to its industry peers or the overall stock market.

Value stocks generally have the following characteristics:

  • They typically are mature businesses.
  • They have steady (but not spectacular) growth rates.
  • They report relatively stable revenues and earnings.
  • Most value stocks pay dividends, although this isn’t a set-in-stone rule.

Growth stocks generally have the following characteristics:

  • They increase their revenue and earnings at a faster rate than the average business in their industry or the market as a whole.
  • They developed an innovative product or service that is gaining share in existing markets, entering new markets, or even creating entirely new industries.
  • They grow faster than average for long periods tend to be rewarded by the market, delivering handsome returns to shareholders in the process.

Regardless of the category of a stock, economic downturns present an opportunity for a value investor. The goal of value investing is to scoop up shares at a discount, and the best time to do so is when the entire stock market is on sale.


References:

  1. https://www.fool.com/investing/stock-market/types-of-stocks/value-stocks/
  2. https://www.fool.com/investing/stock-market/types-of-stocks/growth-stocks/

Berkshire-Hathaway Stock

  • Berkshire Hathaway has beaten the S&P 500 going back 20 years.
  • The company is built to endure the most challenging market environments.

The “Oracle of Omaha” Warren Buffett is a legendary billionaire investor and one of the world’s wealthiest people. While his start at a very early age helped him build a fortune, Buffett hasn’t lost his investing touch.

Since becoming CEO in 1965, the Oracle of Omaha has overseen a greater than 4,400,000% return in his company’s Class A shares (BRK.A). This works out to a nearly 20% annualized return over 58 years.

Additionally, Berkshire Hathaway has outperformed the S&P 500 index over the past 20 years. Had you invested $10,000 in Berkshire Hathaway in 2003, you would have more than $71,000 today to the S&P 500’s $62,200.

Buffett, and his investing lieutenants, Ted Weschler and Todd Combs, are huge fans of businesses that regularly buy back their stock and increase Berkshire Hathaway’s ownership stake without him or his investment team having to lift a finger.

Stock buybacks can have a positive fundamental impact on a company. For a company with steady or growing net income, buybacks have the ability to increase earnings per share over time. This should help a company’s stock look even more attractive to fundamentally focused value seekers.


References:

  1. https://www.fool.com/premium/coverage/investing/2023/09/27/if-you-invested-10000-in-berkshire-hathaway-in-200/
  2. https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/topstocks/warren-buffett-is-selling-shares-of-this-high-yield-dividend-stock-and-likely-buying-shares-of-his-favorite-stock-no-not-apple/ar-AA1hkkk9

Long-term Investing Perspective

Warren Buffett once said, “Someone is sitting in the shade today because someone planted a tree a long time ago.”

One tried and true investment philosophy is investing with a long-term perspective. In essence, the time-arbitrage approach gives long-term investors an edge. Most investors are focused on the short term, basing trading decisions on factors that may have little to do with business fundamentals, such as quarterly earnings beat or miss or overall market volatility.

Long-term investors often adopt a long-term perspective while taking advantage of the shortsightedness and noise of the market. They tend to conduct extensive research and conduct a deep dive into the fundamentals of every company in which they are considering an investment.

Their extensive research allows them to develop an informed and thorough understanding of the longer-term secular advantages of these companies. Ultimately, they are more interested in the duration of a company’s growth opportunity rather than being overly focused on its timing.

They like to invest early before a company is on the market’s radar because they believe it’s impossible to pinpoint precisely when the market will notice and start trading the stock up to reflect its growth opportunity properly. This is a vital part of the engine that drives alpha for us.

Low turnover is an outgrowth of this investment process rather than a goal in and of itself. If they find and invest in the right companies, they believe that it makes little sense to replace these companies with new and relatively untested ones. Wsupported remain invested throughout the duration of the growth trajectory of our highest conviction companies. We also believe this is a more tax efficient approach to managing a portfolio and one that is often attractive to company management who are aware of our reputation as long-term holders of stock.

Your primary goal must be capital appreciation, and you should stay involved as companies grow and flourish as long as your investment thesis holds true.

The best risk management starts with knowing the companies in which you invest. By conducting extensive research prior to initiating a position in a company and continuing to conduct due diligence will keep you apprised of the company’s growth story.

Tesla – Electric Vehicles

Tesla is planning to build another factory overseas, There is a demand across the globe by several nations wanting the plant to built.

Tayyip Erdogan, the president of Turkey, would like the next Tesla factory to be built in his country. Erdogan asked the Tesla CEO to put the eighth factory for its electric vehicles in Turkey.

Musk mentioned India as a possible place to make a low-cost electric vehicle. Tesla is currently building a factory in Mexico.

Saudi Arabia is also vying for the new plant. Attracting Tesla would be part of a push by Saudi Arabia to secure metals needed for EVs in Africa as the country tries to diversify its economy away from oil, reports Barron’s.

Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)

 

  • The ROIC is the operating profit divided by the invested capital. It tells us how much money the company can generate with new capital by investing in profitable projects.
  • The ROIC basically explains how much shareholder wealth could be generated in the future and is oftentimes highly correlated with a high P/E.

Return on invested capital, or ROIC, is a valuable financial ratio  A high ROIC rewards companies that are able to produce the most net operating profit with the least amount of invested capital.

The basics of ROIC are very simple: it basically tells us how much profits are generated (financials statement) compared to how much capital is invested in the company (balance sheet), provided as a percentage. If the ROIC is 10%, it tells us that the company is generating $10 of profits with each $100 that it invested in the company.

ROIC is net operating profit minus taxes minus dividends divided by invested capital:

Image placeholder title

ROIC is net operating profit minus taxes minus dividends divided by invested capital:

ROIC is a measure of how much cash a company gets back for each dollar it invests in its business.

ROIC is a much better predictor of company performance than either return on assets or return on equity. In ROA and ROE, the key metric is net income. Net income often has nothing to do with the profitability of a company. Significant expenses are not included in net income such as interest income, discontinued operations, minority interest, etc. which can make a company look profitable when it is not. Also, ROA measures how much net income a company generates for each dollar of assets on its balance sheet. The problem with using this metric is that companies can carry a lot of assets that have nothing to do with their operations, so ROA isn’t always an accurate measure of profitability.

ROE has similar limitations as ROA. ROE is a measure of company profit compared to shareholder equity. Although this might seem a reasonable metric, many companies use financial leverage to raise ROE. Companies often increase debt levels to repurchase shares, thereby increasing ROE. Using this financial leverage to affect ROE does not accurately reflect a company’s profitability, returns or long-term prospects.

Companies with higher-than-median ROIC (when viewed in conjunction with their overall capital-expenditure and operating-expenditure strategy) will deliver better returns.

Valuation biasedness is one of the most common investing errors.

Some investors prefer picking a stock which is “undervalued” rather than buying a more expensive stock with strong long-term fundamentals. As a consequence, they oftentimes end up with “value traps” which actually destroy shareholder value over time. One of the reasons for this is that they know how to “value” a company (via multiples etc.), but lack the ability to determine the quality of a company and its potential to drive long-term value for shareholders.

The most important metric will tell you whether you are buying a good company that is able to generate strong future shareholder wealth: the return on invested capital (“ROIC”).

Basically, investors should look for a high (+10%) and consistent ROIC. In the long run, the ROIC can be a leading indicator of what an investor may expect from longer term stock returns.


References:

  1. https://www.thestreet.com/opinion/10-stocks-with-high-return-on-invested-capital-and-why-you-should-care-13279076

Small Cap Stock Investing

Small Cap Stocks

The Real Value of Wealth

Invest first before living like a King and Queen

Asset vs Liability

Son: Dad, may I speak with you?
Dad: Go ahead.
Son: Among all my classmates, I am the only one without a car. It is embarrassing.
Dad: What do you want me to do?
Son: I need a car. I don’t want to feel odd.
Dad: Do you have a particular car in mind?
Son: Yes dad (smiling)
Dad: How much?
Son: $15K
Dad: I will give you the money on one condition.
Son: What is the condition?
Dad: You will not use the money to buy a car but invest it. If you make enough profit from the investment, you can go ahead and buy the car.
Son: Deal.

Then, the father gave him a check of $15K. The son cashed the check and invested it in obedience to the verbal agreement that he had with his father.

Some months later, the father asked the son how he was faring. The son responded that his business was improving. The father left him.

After some months again, the father asked him about his business again and the son told him that he is making a lot of profit from the business.

When it was exactly a year after he gave him the money, the father asked him to show him how far the business has gone. The son readily agreed and the following discussion took place:

Dad: From this I can see that you have made a lot of money.
Son: Yes dad.
Dad: Do you still remember our agreement?
Son: Yes
Dad: What is it?
Son: We agreed that I should invest the money and buy the car from the profit.
Dad: Why have you not bought the car?
Son: I don’t need the car. I want to invest more.
Dad: Good. You have learned the lessons that I wanted to teach you.
– You didn’t really need the car, you just wanted to feel apart of the crowd. That would have placed extra financial obligations on you. It wasn’t an asset then; but a liability.
– Two, it is very important for you to invest in your future before living like a king.
Son: Thanks dad.

Then the father gave him the keys of the latest model of that car.

MORALS:
1. Always invest first before you start living the way you want.

2. What you see as a need now may become a want if you can take a little time to get over your feelings.

3. Try to be able to distinguish between an asset and a liability so that what you see as an asset today will not become a liability to you tomorrow.